Get the latest insights
delivered straight to your inbox
Feb 11, 2020
Brenda R. Smyth, Supervisor of Content Creation
Here’s what we know: Workplace flexibility is important to employees. Having the option of working from home makes them happy, more productive and more likely to stay in their jobs. Technology advances can keep them connected.
So, if it’s such a great perk with so much research to support it, why aren’t all companies jumping on board?
Is the growing trend toward workplace collaboration and the need to access specialized employee knowledge causing some organizations to pump the breaks on this flexibility? “How can we pull Tyler in on this latest crisis if he’s at home camped out on his couch?”
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows that the number of remote workers has been on a plateau for the past ten years. In 2018, 23.7 percent of employed people in the U.S. worked remotely. According to the BLS, occupational categories with the highest percentages of people working from home were professional and related with 32.4 percent; management, business, and financial operations with 33.6 percent; and sales and related with 27.4 percent. In an average workday, these three segments worked 3.16 hours away from the office.
How does that compare to previous years? In 2006, telecommuting was slightly lower than it is now with 21.1 percent of the workforce doing some or part of their work from home. The same three BLS occupational categories ranked highest, with only the sales and related jobs being significantly lower at 20.3 percent.
The number of remote workers reached today’s levels beginning in 2009 and has only fluctuated slightly over the past 10 years.
Despite advances in technology that make it easier to work remotely and studies that clearly indicate that remote work is incredibly valuable to employees — linking it to employee engagement, productivity and retention — organizations have been slow to loosen their grip and let employees work from home regularly, according to Kristen Senz for hbs.edu.
Let’s take a closer look at the value employees place on flexibility. One study showed that the average employee was willing to accept 8% less pay for the option to work from home. Senz also points to research by Prithwiraj Choudhury at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) showing a 4.4 percent productivity gain with the expansion of a “work from anywhere” arrangement for patent examiner employees.
But researchers acknowledge that some of this research and the potential gains don’t necessarily transfer to all work environments or jobs. The patent examiners in Choudhury’s study work independently and their jobs require minimal coordination.
Many jobs today require greater interaction and collaboration. And in a business world where products are increasingly complex, technology changes quickly and customers’ evolving demands must be met, collaboration has been touted as a key to being better able to meet unseen challenges by tapping the varied knowledge and experience of all workers.
Will these demands for collaboration and agility dampen work-from-home arrangements?
Are there ways organizations can structure collaboration to keep it from draining employees and still offer the flexibility they want?
Although there are many advantages to allowing employees to work remotely, the need for collaboration can cause organizations to avoid the perk. Consider how to make remote collaboration stronger and more effective.
Write for Us! We welcome fresh voices and new points of view as we research and cover business topics. If you're interested in guest blogging, contact: astepp@skillpath.com.
Brenda R. Smyth
Supervisor of Content Creation
Brenda Smyth is supervisor of content creation at SkillPath. Drawing from 20-plus years of business and management experience, her writings have appeared on Forbes.com, Entrepreneur.com and Training Industry Magazine.
Latest Articles
Article Topics